Thursday, September 25, 2008
I don't tend to discuss religion much here. I'm not sure that a blog with "Bitter" in the title is a good place for that, at least in my case. I'm considering starting another, more personal blog along those lines, but then I'd have three blogs going on, and I'm not sure I'm ready for that level of commitment. Then again, I have (as I've noted before) a lot of half-finished projects going on, so what's one more?
Anyway, as I watched the first presidential debate the other night and and some serious question-dodging in the process, a scripture popped into my head. At some point when I was younger, I remember my dad teaching me about Revelation 3:15-16:
I'll admit it: this one scared me a little bit, since I've always found it pretty easy to become complacent and non-committal and have to fight that tendency every day.15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.
It's probably good, then, that I've followed the career path I have. I'm an analyst, and in my previous job I was an analyst. What that really means is that I don't do any real work but get paid to have an opinion about what other people should be doing. For the most part, I don't have the luxury of being non-committal.
Fortunately, I'm not paid to have an opinion about the economic bailout plan, because I really can't decide what I think. On one hand, I'm a free-market capitalist that believes in the long-run, the system works itself out and we end up better off, but on the other hand, I'm a little scared of the short run. I've seen "Grapes of Wrath" (and I think read it long, long ago), and I'm not that keen on living in a colorless, dusty world (although some would argue that I already do). We apparently will also all have to live off of canned soup; someone at work Monday while watching the market drop noticed that Campbell's was the only stock going up.
After watching the presidential debate, I'm not entirely sure where either of them stand on the whole thing either, although they are apparently both going to vote for it. I will say that I don't think I've ever seen anyone dodge a question as consistently and enthusiastically as Obama did when asked what he'd cut in order to fund the bailout. I do at least know how I would have answered that question without cutting anything really important and without raising taxes.
For one, the government could stop advertising the digital TV transition. If we knew that a comet was going to collide with the Earth in February 2009, I'm not sure we'd even provide as much warning about that to the American people as we have about the digital TV transition. I don't know exactly what advertising costs right now, but it can't be that much more expensive to bankroll a war than it has been to keep this "No Couch Potato Left Behind" program going.
Second, we could create some real revenue utilizing what our government already has. For example, you could rent out the Capitol building for concerts, MTV "Sweet 16" birthday parties... anything that would generate a lot of cash. Don't get me wrong, I've been to the Capitol, and it's a great building with a lot of statues, but judging from C-SPAN there are typically more statues there than lawmakers, unless there is an economic meltdown going on. If that doesn't bring in enough revenue, we could throw in tours of Area 51 or rides on the Space Shuttle. For even bigger thrill-seekers you could offer the "hunt with a senior offiical" package.
Third, we could use Craigslist and eBay to have the largest garage sale in history. Trust me, I worked in the government long enough and visited enough government facilities to know that there is no shortage of old, useless junk, and apparently one person's old, useless junk is another person's new, useless junk. I'm not sure how many eBay experts there are in Washington, but they could figure it out with a free trail from the Video Professor.
Will all of this generate $700M? It's hard for me to say without running the numbers. Again judging by the debate, you can fudge the numbers a little, so I think my ideas would probably fly.